Michigan's Intramural Scoring Policy is Blatantly Sexist

Michigan's Intramural Scoring Policy is Blatantly Sexist

The Michigan Daily ran an article today about the charges of sexism that are being brought against the IM sports league on campus. Normally when I hear “sexism” on the UM campus I immediately roll my eyes in preparation for whatever I’m about to hear, but in this case, it’s actually a very legitimate point.


The issue at hand is that in the lower level “B” intramural sports, including basketball, soccer, flag football and ultimate Frisbee, when a girl scores, they receive more points than when a man does. For example, in soccer, when a guy scores, it’s a goal. A Girl? Two goals. Then there’s also something called a 4-point 3-pointer in basketball, only available to those who have boobs.


The issue should be obvious; the suggestion is that women are less physically able than men so their efforts “count more” when they actually manage to do something right like score a point. This is what’s known as “Family Reunion Rules” when your five year old cousin scores a soccer goal, it’s worth five so that he thinks he’s a super important part of the team. The notion that these are official written rules is especially preposterous. LSA rep Steve Benson had this to say:


“We didn’t think it was fair that women have to adhere to this rule,” Benson said. “It’s generalizing that all girls aren’t as good as guys at sports…It’s frustrating when you’re (up) by one and you end up losing when a girl scores.”


So the guys are pissed off that the “girl rule” can sink a game, and the girls are pissed off because the same rule trivializes their accomplishments on the field. Yeah, I think that about sums it up, but not everyone gets it. A recent comment:


This article sounds like it was written by some nerd who has sat behind his desk for 8 years and has never played a sport in his life. Anyone can see that these rules only promote the participation of female players in IM sports. If everyone was equal, female players would get less touches, passes, shots, etc.


Haha, I went to high school with the writer, and as I recall he actually played quite a few sports. Props Calero for writing about something that is actually interesting to read and ponder. Yes, ponder.

 

Advertisement

Comments

Anonymous
I'm sorry to call bullshit, but BULLSHIT. I saw this article today and laughed. To call this a legitimate argument requires the same logic that would end male/female sport segregation.

Men ARE superior on average during athletic contests. That's why sports are separated by sex. Testosterone makes men leaner, stronger and faster than their female counterparts. That's why girls don't play basketball in the NBA. That's why females have their own podiums in the olympics. IT'S NOT SEXIST, IT'S BIOLOGY.

I'm sorry, but you're an idiot if you think these rules need to go. WIthout them, there wouldn't be co-ed anything. 75% or girls wouldn't get the ball passed to them. The guys would take over and it would end up as testosterone-fueled and competitive as men's leagues.

And I'm not discounting female athleticism. In some areas of the sporting world, their natural agility and balance are often an advantage. But our IM team sports need these rules if girls are going to be encouraged to play with guys.

I'm as supportive for equal rights as the next guy, but you gotta call bullshit when you see it... and this is NOT a Quickie Burger logo argument. It's goddamn common sense.
Posted 09/23/2008 1:40 PMReply
Anonymous
yeah TCal! nice article.
Tassi nice find.
so glad i went to high school with the both of you.
Posted 09/23/2008 4:24 PMReply
MattyC
yea, totally agree with anonymous #1. Co-ed IM sports would suck ass if there wasn't the encouragement for girls to score. Trust me, I played something like 11 IM sports sophomore year haha. Posted 09/23/2008 10:39 PMReply
redhawkwriter
We have those rules at Miami, too. As a guy, I think it's lame, but the female opinion is one that outweighs the male's in this case, I believe. At least here at Miami, girls aren't too happy about the rules. Like the article says, they feel it diminishes their accomplishments. Yes, on average guys might be more athletic if you include LeBron James or Brett Favre into the conversation. If you just look at the pool of collegiate, intramural athletes, though, I think you'll see that the pool is relatively equal for the most part. Posted 09/24/2008 10:43 AMReply
Anonymous
I think Steven Benson is in Sammy. Add sammy to the list! I think this daily article is great. Posted 09/25/2008 01:32 AMReply
Anonymous
Umm, are you an idiot. Men are much more athletic in general then women. It's simple biology. Men are for the most part faster, stronger, and bigger. To bring in professional athletes is just pointless. How many women in the WNBA have been able to dunk in a game? Now how many boys in high school have dunked in a game? If you want equality, try algebra, because in real life there is no such thing. Posted 09/25/2008 03:05 AMReply
Anonymous
Only someone in Sammy would complain about girls scoring on them. Posted 09/25/2008 10:07 AMReply
Anonymous
girls really do suck at sports, their goals should be worth atleast 3 points Posted 09/27/2008 11:39 AMReply

Leave a comment


Please enter the text you see below or login to post with a username.