- Short Term Rental Apartments in London, UK
- A Valentine's Day Letter from your Girlfriend
- Lunch Break: Stephen Colbert Discusses The Beer Pong Herpes Outbreak
- Lunch Break: Joaquin Phoenix Performs Song From Debut Rap Album, Fights With Audience Member
- The Lonely Island: I'm on a Boat
- Lunch Break: Stephen Colbert Drops a Profanity On The Today Show, Shocks Meredith Viera
- Lunch Break: Barney Stinson's Guide To Picking Up Women With Time Travel
- Lunch Break: Jon Stewart's 1994 Interview With Conan O'Brien
- Lunch Break: Larry King's Interviews With Famous Comedians
- Lunch Break: Will Ferrell's "You're Welcome, America"
Did you know that there is a third candidate running for president of the United States?
Of course you didn’t, because no one cares about a non-Republican, non-Democratic nominee.
Still, rest assured, there is one, and his name is Ralph Nader.
On Monday, Nader, who is running as an independent in his fourth consecutive presidential bid, held a campaign rally at Dartmouth, but he was peeved to find the student body grossly indifferent towards his presence.
The Dartmouth reports:
Nader noted that fewer than 10 of the approximately 40 audience members appeared to be Dartmouth students. He criticized the “sterile political debate at Dartmouth,” adding that the College is known as the most conservative school in the Ivy League.
[…] “The whole concept of a liberal arts education is to transform the mind to foresee and forestall bad things and to detect and build good things,” Nader said. “Campuses should come alive and spend as much time on this election as football and frats.”
Actually, Nader, students do care about this election – as long as the candidate speaking is named John McCain or Barack Obama.
In 2012, when Obama is up for re-election, please spare Dartmouth from your visit.
Thanks.







Stumble It























Nader stands for many things that neither Obama in his saber rattling against Afghanistan nor McCain in his 100 year war againt Iraq believe in.
The Democrats and Repulbicans have become the parties of special interests (oil, nuclear energy, Wall street).
Nader supporters should not in blind hope, stupidly vote for either Obama or McCain (collectively Jarack McBama) in effect giving him a non binding proxy.
Why would any one who supports solar energy over nuclear energy NOT vote for Nader?
Jarack McBama does not support solar energy-He is talking about increasing offshore drillng and nuclear energy.
Why would any one who believes that before we spend $700 billion to bail out Wall street that we have a public debate on the matter NOT vote for Nader?
Jarack McBama rushed to pass the bail out.
Why would any one who believes that the US should not be increasing our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan NOT vote for Nader?
Jarack McBama favors increased miliary involvement in Iraq, Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan.
It is heavy handed and against principles of democracy and progressivism as well as shortsided to have said and to say now that Nader supporters should have abandoned their core principals and voted for the empty suit that was Al Gore or today to vote for Jarack McBama. Posted 10/08/2008 8:09 PMReply
We had the chance for real debate and dialog, but as usual, too many voters think this is a popularity contest where they get to wear some kind of "Yeah, bitch. I voted for the guy who won, that makes ME a winner too" button after the election. If either McCain or Obama win, we all lose. Posted 10/10/2008 5:07 PMReply