Ralph Nader Visits Dartmouth, Slams Students For Not Caring

Ralph Nader Visits Dartmouth, Slams Students For Not Caring

Did you know that there is a third candidate running for president of the United States?

 

Of course you didn’t, because no one cares about a non-Republican, non-Democratic nominee.

 

Still, rest assured, there is one, and his name is Ralph Nader.

 

On Monday, Nader, who is running as an independent in his fourth consecutive presidential bid, held a campaign rally at Dartmouth, but he was peeved to find the student body grossly indifferent towards his presence.

 

The Dartmouth reports:

Nader noted that fewer than 10 of the approximately 40 audience members appeared to be Dartmouth students. He criticized the “sterile political debate at Dartmouth,” adding that the College is known as the most conservative school in the Ivy League.


[…] “The whole concept of a liberal arts education is to transform the mind to foresee and forestall bad things and to detect and build good things,” Nader said. “Campuses should come alive and spend as much time on this election as football and frats.”

Actually, Nader, students do care about this election – as long as the candidate speaking is named John McCain or Barack Obama.

 

In 2012, when Obama is up for re-election, please spare Dartmouth from your visit.

 

Thanks.

 

+ 14 comments

Related Posts

Comments

Anonymous
What a lame article. In the world outside Dartmouth, many people do care. At least about 15% of likely voters (so this doesn't count the half of the country that doesn't vote) are not planning on voting for McCain and Obama. About ten million of them for Nader. Even more people support the issues Nader stands for (see recent issue of Yes! mag that shows what a majority of Americans agree on--incidentally agreeing with Nader). But apparently Dartmouth is too 'good' to care about what's important to most of the country Posted 10/08/2008 5:34 PMReply
Anonymous
Wow. Was this written by a college kid? None of the telltale signs are present: no kneejerk reactionary positions; no repetition of catch-phrases pre-approved by the author's demographic; certainly no insight bespeaking an engaged mind probing a complex issue. Instead we get "no one cares" and a lot of strident rhetoric. Guess it's just another piece from the MSM - maybe the NYT? Posted 10/08/2008 5:54 PMReply
Anonymous
It's not like you have to vote for him, Nader is a remarkable person with a long resume (Obama's resume pales in comparison to Nader's, frankly). It really is pathetic that only 10 students showed up. This post is really stupid, snide, arrogant and uninformed. Nader gave this country seatbelts, clean air act, clean water act, osha and freedom of information act, to name just a few things. What the hell have you done? Posted 10/08/2008 6:17 PMReply
Anonymous
oh poor nader Posted 10/08/2008 6:42 PMReply
Anonymous
Nader is NOT a Democrat - he is a progressive UNTOUCHED by any special interests. Obama and McCain are part of the corrupt two party system that caused the current mess.

Nader stands for many things that neither Obama in his saber rattling against Afghanistan nor McCain in his 100 year war againt Iraq believe in.

The Democrats and Repulbicans have become the parties of special interests (oil, nuclear energy, Wall street).

Nader supporters should not in blind hope, stupidly vote for either Obama or McCain (collectively Jarack McBama) in effect giving him a non binding proxy.

Why would any one who supports solar energy over nuclear energy NOT vote for Nader?

Jarack McBama does not support solar energy-He is talking about increasing offshore drillng and nuclear energy.

Why would any one who believes that before we spend $700 billion to bail out Wall street that we have a public debate on the matter NOT vote for Nader?

Jarack McBama rushed to pass the bail out.

Why would any one who believes that the US should not be increasing our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan NOT vote for Nader?

Jarack McBama favors increased miliary involvement in Iraq, Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan.

It is heavy handed and against principles of democracy and progressivism as well as shortsided to have said and to say now that Nader supporters should have abandoned their core principals and voted for the empty suit that was Al Gore or today to vote for Jarack McBama.
Posted 10/08/2008 8:09 PMReply
Anonymous
To the anonymous comment about me. First off combining the candidates names was assinine. In doing that you belittle their great differences and what each stands for. That being said i do believe that Nader is a great candidate and has done many great things. I agree with his stance on most of the issues. My reason for not voting for him and i feel like its not only my reason is that i want my vote to count for something. I would rather use my vote to try and elect the better of the two likely candidates in the race then use it on Nader who, lets face it, has no chance. I dont want to use my vote on him and end up in a country with a President McCain. Posted 10/08/2008 9:46 PMReply
Anonymous
Uh, There is no difference between McBama, just more of the same status quo you have grown to enjoy. When you get your big boy pants you will finally see that. Posted 10/08/2008 11:32 PMReply
Anonymous
It's quite disconcerting to see such blatent disregard for diversity in intellectual and political thought in what was considered a prestigious Ivy league university. Ralph Nader may be a 3rd party candidate, but if the student body or the author of this particular blog had any kind of intellectual authenticity or cared about the future of this country or education itself then he or she would welcome Ralph Nader, Bob Barr, Cynthia McKinney and other 3rd party candidates as viable choices that a real democracy can and should support. Shame on you Dartmouth for your apathy and lack of questioning the two party system that dominates D.C. Even my Community College students have more sense that that. Posted 10/09/2008 01:37 AMReply
Anonymous
a tool wrote this article Posted 10/09/2008 01:39 AMReply
Anonymous
Maybe he went when there was a football game or maybe a good frat party? Then again maybe Dartmouth is just full of conservative pricks?? Posted 10/10/2008 08:35 AMReply
Anonymous
Two-party system? Since when have we had a two-party system? All I see are Republicans and Democrats - all part of the same Corporatist Party. It is a certainty either McCain or Obama will win the election. How is that choice at all? Both corporate shills who vote for more war money, open borders and baby killing. Nice. Posted 10/10/2008 4:58 PMReply
Anonymous
McStatus QuObama... Evilbankers.com! Posted 10/10/2008 4:59 PMReply
Anonymous
To anonymous at 9:46pm - Wasting your vote on the lesser of two evils is what got us into this mess. Do your research, grow a spine and vote your conscience. Obama is just as bad as McCain - only in other ways.

We had the chance for real debate and dialog, but as usual, too many voters think this is a popularity contest where they get to wear some kind of "Yeah, bitch. I voted for the guy who won, that makes ME a winner too" button after the election. If either McCain or Obama win, we all lose.
Posted 10/10/2008 5:07 PMReply
Anonymous
As Jim Hightower (someone college students should be reading regularly) likes to say, as regards Ralph Nader and other non-ruling party candidates, we don't need a third party, we need a SECOND party. I refer you to any number of editorials run over the last two years or so in the New York Times and the Washington Post (two media outlets presumably favored by Ivy League students entranced by Barack Obama) expressing similar sentiments. Posted 10/10/2008 9:29 PMReply

Add a comment

Anonymous comment

Please enter the code or log in.

Facebook Comment