- Win $100,000 for Picking Top BCS Teams
- Play of the Day: Dwayne Wade Sinks Shot From Opposite Free-Throw Line
- Play of the Day: Christian Laettner's Legendary 1992 Buzzer Beater Against Kentucky
- Play of the Day: Wyoming's Adam Waddell Performs a Post-Dunk Flip
- Sports Nugget: Jimmy Fallon Endorses the U. of Tennessee Chattanooga Mocs
- Sports Nugget: LeBron James And The Cleveland Cavaliers' Pregame Faux Photo Shoot Routine
- Sports Nugget: The Mike Tyson Documentary
- Play of the Day: LSU Women's Soccer Goalie Scores 90-Yard Goal
- March Madness has officially begun
- MMA hit by steroid epidemic
Many colleges have been embroiled in controversy over the alleged offensiveness of their mascots. Just last year, University of Illinois’ Chief Illiniwek performed his last mascoting duties due to opposition by Native American activist groups.
Now a new controversy is cropping up. A Christian group wants Duke’s Blue Devils name gone because they find it similarly offensive. Digtriad.com reports the group’s perspective:
"If the team were named the Blue Nazis would that be ok?" asks Mark Dice, spokesperson for The Resistance, an international Christian organization that is behind the efforts for a name change, "There would be outrage across the country, yet naming a team after the Devil is ok?"
Did they really just compare calling the team the Blue Devils and calling it the Blue Nazis? Oh yes they did. Then again, what do you expect from a group also condemning Starbucks’ logo? A Star Tribune article from March chronicles even more of The Resistance’s crazy talk:
The Resistance says the new image "has a naked woman on it with her legs spread like a prostitute," Mark Dice, founder of the group, said in a news release. "Need I say more? It's extremely poor taste, and the company might as well call themselves Slutbucks."
Ah, Slutbucks, now that’s an idea that could really take off. Oh and did I mention this is part of their manifesto:
We are dedicated to educating those who have a desire to understand the New World Order and how members of secret societies control the true power in politics, banking, media, and religious institutions around the world.
But back to the current controversy at hand. Should Duke be forced to change their name from the Blue Devils to something less hellish? If so, The Resistance may want to add the following to their protest checklist:
Dirt Devil vacuums: sending innocent dirt to hell for the past 100 years.
Devil Rays: the sports team and the animal
Devil Dog cakes: they’re sinfully delicious
Sun Devil Stadium, Tempe AZ: a place of idolatry for football worshippers
Devilled eggs: gross tasting and blasphemous
Daredevils: they deserve to burn in hell for those fancy bike tricks
The Resistance better get moving, there’s so much blasphemy and so little time.







Stumble It
























It's like saying that "basketball players" are criminals because a few of them are involved in a shooting.
Or that "eggs" are bad for you because someone finds one spoiled in their egg carton when they get home from the grocery store.
Different Christian denominations believe different things. Why does the article not state what denomination the "Christian group" is part of?
Too vague can actually mean mis-information. So in other words, I feel that this article along with MOST about Christians and/or Christian groups are usually written in a way to BASH all Christians. This is why most people "hate" Christians (but in a defensive way).
The other side :
Though there are points I agree with and disagree with about this situation, I think that these groups are what gives Christians a "extremist" reputation.
I don't LOVE the idea of using the devil as a mascot, and I may not "support" it in any way. But I don't think that tearing things down is the answer either. Posted 09/19/2008 5:07 PMReply
They must be Tar Heels fans!! Posted 09/19/2008 5:34 PMReply