- Short Term Rental Apartments in London, UK
- A Valentine's Day Letter from your Girlfriend
- Lunch Break: Stephen Colbert Discusses The Beer Pong Herpes Outbreak
- Lunch Break: Joaquin Phoenix Performs Song From Debut Rap Album, Fights With Audience Member
- The Lonely Island: I'm on a Boat
- Lunch Break: Stephen Colbert Drops a Profanity On The Today Show, Shocks Meredith Viera
- Lunch Break: Barney Stinson's Guide To Picking Up Women With Time Travel
- Lunch Break: Jon Stewart's 1994 Interview With Conan O'Brien
- Lunch Break: Larry King's Interviews With Famous Comedians
- Lunch Break: Will Ferrell's "You're Welcome, America"
Coming straight from the research labs of Rutgers, a study was published in Journal of Investigative Dermatology stating that some skin moisturizers may increase the chances of getting a type of skin cancer called squamous cell carcinoma.
The mechanism behind the cancer inducing effects of moisturizers are unknown, and the carcinogenic ingredient(s) are also undiscovered. But scientists suspect mineral oil and sodium laurel sulphate, two common additives in moisturizers.
Interestingly, Rutgers and Johnson & Johnson have already come up with a patented kind of moisturizer that contain no mineral oil or sodium laurel sulphate.
As reported in Rutger's local newspaper, the Hackensack, NJ-based Record (and for some reason available online via the Tulsa World):
Moisturizers may speed skin cancer in reformed sunbathers, even years after giving up on tanning, according to a Rutgers University study of mice.
Four different brands of moisturizing creams caused tumors to form faster and larger in hairless mice that had been pretreated with ultraviolet radiation, the Rutgers researchers reported Thursday in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
"We don't know what happens in humans," said Alan Conney, who led the study. "But this is a red light saying there should be some epidemiological study in human populations."
Manufacturers of the products — Eucerin Original Moisturizing Creme, Vanicream, Dermabase and Dermovan, all chosen randomly for the study — refuted the findings.
"Eucerin Original Creme has been on the market for more than 100 years and is a highly respected, dermatologist-recommended brand," a statement by Beiersdorf Inc. said.
"It has been widely used by both individuals with normal skin and those with diseased skin under the care of physicians without any incidents of this nature ever reported."
PSI Pharmaceutical Specialties, makers of Vanicream, said the results had "doubtful significance," given the methods that were used.
So maybe we're all better off with dry-skin. Full story here.







Stumble It























i'm not only shocked by the shadiness of the rutgers' scientists but the stupidity in some of these people's comments.
for shame. Posted 08/17/2008 12:00 AMReply
http://householdproducts.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/household/brands?tbl=chem&id=98 Posted 08/17/2008 12:21 AMReply
http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/r?dbs+hsdb:@term+@rn+151-21-3 Posted 08/17/2008 12:28 AMReply
@everyone else: I basically try not to rely on any product all the time, so that I only take in the unavoidable toxins in moderation, sadly there's no way around coming in contact with these things :( Although, it's ALWAYS a good idea to take statistics and studies with a grain of salt, particularly in the case when a popular ingredient is being discredited at the same time an alternative is being introduced by the person who conducted the study Posted 08/17/2008 05:57 AMReply
Also, mineral oil was the other suspected ingredient in the moisturizers. It is a component of petroleum, which is one of the most carcinogic substances on the planet. Don't use vaseline, baby oil, or creams with these things in it if you care about your health. Your skin does absorb the things you put on it - and why put something know to cause cancer on it?
I am so glad to read about this study! Posted 08/17/2008 09:11 AMReply