Brigham Young Student Art Project Censored For Proving Existence of Gays

Brigham Young Student Art Project Censored For Proving Existence of Gays
Brigham Young Student Art Project Censored For Proving Existence of GaysBrigham Young Student Art Project Censored For Proving Existence of GaysBrigham Young Student Art Project Censored For Proving Existence of Gays

Gay people exist.

 

Does such a well-known fact offend you? Are you suddenly going into spastic convulsions whilst lamenting the thought that somewhere out there men and women exist who prefer companionship from someone of their own gender?

 

Well, if you’re a member of Brigham Young’s homosexuality-intolerant administration, chances are you’re already angrily pounding a response into the comment box below.

 

Last month, a BYU student named Michael unveiled his fine art portrait project on his blog.

 

The premise:

These are some of the final images for my fine art photography project. These portraits are of students of BYU who identify themselves as homosexual and a person that supports them. With all of the dissenting views regarding this topic in the past few months I have felt very strongly about this project. The portraits will be shown in pairs. The idea is that there are gay and lesbian individuals not only in the Mormon culture, but also at BYU. I also chose to photograph someone who is a support to this person. This could be a family member or friend. This support person may also identify themselves as homosexual and both people may provide support to each other. I am not telling the viewer who identifies themselves as homosexual, because I hope the viewer will realize that placing a label with the portrait only creates divisions in our society and furthers stereotypes. It is my hope this body of work can be a vehicle for tolerance, support, love and change.

As it turns out, Michael’s project is "offensive," because it proves that—gasp—homosexuality isn’t a myth and/or celebrates something that is considered deplorable by Mormons.

 

And so, the administration quietly pulled it from the display at the fine arts department.

I know it’s Brigham Young, so my expectations for this so-called institution of “higher learning” should be appropriately tempered, but...

 

What’s next, BYU? Censoring the yearbook pictures of students identified to be gay?
 

+ 12 comments

Related Posts

Comments

Anonymous
They would probably also censor this student if he pictured students that identified themselves as actively having heterosexual sex. There is an honor code at this school. If you don't like the rules don't go. Posted 12/09/2008 12:36 PMReply
Anonymous
To the previous commentor: the students are not identified as actively having homosexual sex, and there is nothing to indicate they're not following the honor code. The simply identify as homosexual. Trust me, I'm still gay even when I'm not actively having sex, and I lived for 6 years as a celibate active Mormon, not dating either gender. Posted 12/09/2008 12:46 PMReply
Anonymous
How ironic. Brigham Young married other mens wives as did Joseph Smith. Most times it was in secret and their husband did not know. Funny how they hide their dirty little secrets and yet claim moral superiority. Shame on them. Posted 12/09/2008 1:01 PMReply
PoisonIvy
I refuse to believe that an institution can call themselves a place of "higher learning" when they believe in such censorship. Unfair. Props to the artist for a truly beautiful exhibit. Posted 12/09/2008 1:57 PMReply
Anonymous
If you don't agree with the policies of this wonderful school then don't go. It's a free country and you can choose to go where ever you want. Why would you go somewhere that doesn't support your ideas? Posted 12/09/2008 2:39 PMReply
Anonymous
As for its merit as an art project, telling everyone that there are gays at BYU is like telling us the sun will come up tomorrow morning. It's not news and hasn't been for a long time. Posted 12/09/2008 3:52 PMReply
Stephensays
BYU probably shouldn't have censored this project. The student has created an exceptional work with even greater merit because of the time and place it was executed. Instead of allowing this achievement to reflect well on BYU as an institution for higher education, they have traded a temporary art show for a lingering reputation of intolerance. Posted 12/09/2008 4:20 PMReply
Anonymous
UPDATE, PLEASE READ!
The pictures were actually removed because other students had defaced them by writing discriminatory words on the faces of the portraits. Rather than try to find out who defaced the pictures and press charges for hate crimes, they have threatened to kick the student out school half way through his senior year for 'promoting a homosexual agenda'
Posted 12/09/2008 5:53 PMReply
Hellmut
Anonymous said at 12:36:
They would probably also censor this student if he pictured students that identified themselves as actively having heterosexual sex. There is an honor code at this school. If you don't like the rules don't go.

Hellmut says:
I agree. Rules may be important. Can you, please, tell me which rule of the honor code Michael has violated. Last I read the BYU honor code, it was perfectly fine to be gay at BYU as long as you were completely celibate.

It seems to me that Michael did not violate any rule of the honor code and that the administration is making stuff up as they go. That has nothing to do with rules but is arbitrary.

If such a rule existed, I would consider it ill-advised and unjust.

But you are right. Technically, BYU can impose almost any rule it wants. But when they do, they should at least live by them instead of harassing students who abide by the rules arbitrarily.
Posted 12/09/2008 7:53 PMReply
Anonymous
They put the exhibit back up
http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,705269360,00.html
Posted 12/10/2008 1:42 PMReply
Anonymous
What if you believe gay sex is an evil sin? Posted 12/11/2008 09:39 AMReply
Anonymous
I go to BYU and I do have issues with the BYU honor code. I do not agree with the person who said, "If you don't like the rules, don't go." I love BYU and I believe it has the potential to be a more accepting and charitable place. Therefore, I will stay here and I will voice my dissent for things I disagree with. That is my right. And for those of you who think our religion is intolerant- like any population we have our bigots and we have our saints. Please do not be hypocrites by addressing our intolerance with your own. Posted 12/11/2008 1:53 PMReply

Add a comment

Anonymous comment

Please enter the code or log in.

Facebook Comment