Jack Cafferty commented on Clinton's chances to win the nomination:

"Barack Obama took another big step toward becoming the Democratic presidential nominee last night. He now has a majority of the pledged delegates – which means it is now impossible for Hillary Clinton to catch him. He also reminded those superdelegates who remain uncommitted that if they endorse Clinton now, they will be going against the will of the voters."

Since when is having majority of the pledged delegates a rationale for superdelegates who remain uncommitted to endorse Obama? Or since when is it a proxy for popular vote? By her tremendous wins in Kentucky and West Virginia, it is obvious that a not unsubstantial percent of her supporters do not want her out of the race and do not want Obama to be the next Democratic president. Shouldn't that be more important to the Democratic party? Also, by staying in doesn't that benefit the Democratic party by bringing in more registered voters than ever before? Hillary is tenacious and she is no elitist whimp.

Cafferty can spin it however he wants with his final "Why does Hillary Clinton continue on when Barack Obama now has a majority of pledged delegates and her campaign is almost $20 million in debt?" but my question is "Why does CNN still continue to present only the Obama spin of the story?"