- Yard Beer Pong
- NEW foam party blog
- Pi Kappa Alpha Rubiks Cube Party
- P.M. Party Train: Post-Spring Break Fun With The Gator Girls
- P.M. Party Train: Philadelphians Swim Through Foam With Lady GaGa
- P.M. Party Train: Epic Flip Cup At Astor College
- P.M. Party Train: Thursday Nights At USC
- P.M. Party Train: The All-Female Mafia Mixer At Florida State
- P.M. Party Train: The "Back to Spring Break" Bash At SD State
- P.M. Party Train: The Sorority Sisters of UM Mixers
It seems that once or twice a week (even during the slow summer months), the dedication "Mike Sloothaak, Purdue Staff" proceeds a letter to the editor in the Exponent. With the considerable number of letters that people send in to the paper each day (believe you me, I worked there for almost 2 years) that's not a particularly easy achievement. But who is this Mike Sloothaak character and why does he involve himself in so many arguments through newsprint?
Revealed through a Google search: Sloothaak (shown above) is a graduate student and employee in the Physics department who works in some lab room. One topic which he is most passionate about is diversity, particularly queer acceptance, and he certainly spends lots of his time writing about it. In November 2004, Sloothaak was suspended without pay for opposing Purdue's United Way campaign because the charity supports anti-gay organizations such as the Boy Scouts. In 2005, he posted on the Purdue ACLU message boards supporting the Indiana Civil Liberties Union against Planned Parenthood.
All of this is backed up by his Facebook account in which his declared political beliefs is Libertarian. Then again, the 40-year-old's religion of choice is "Satanism" so who knows. Sloothaak has a solid 4 friends listed in his friends box, two of whom he friended on Nov. 8 and Nov. 9, respectively. To be fair, he didn't join Facebook until August 21.







Stumble It
























But what concerns me is the contention that the Indiana Civil Liberties Union is somehow against Planned Parenthood, or that I supported such a position. That certainly is not the case, and a reading of the link the author provided does not support that contention. Again, I assume that just an honest mistake by the author.
But I would like to help readers (and apparently the essayist's) understanding of libertarian views. Libertarians hold as central a belief that government should minimize its interference in the private lies of its citizens. Purdue--being a public university and an extension of government-- is 'fair game' for libertarian critiques. Purdue should not be discriminating in its hiring, admissions, or charity support. Libertarians beleive that when the goverment interacts with it citizens, it should do so without regard to their race, gender expression, or religion. Also that government should minimize the opprotunities as a general rule. Purdue's explicit support of United Way charities (at the expense of others) is offensive to true libertarians. Its attempts to honor the racist commedian Earl Butz with Lecture hall dedication is another example of endorsing opinions that government be avoiding from a libertarian point of view.
And Facebook? Well that's not a libertarian issue. Facebook is just entirely superficial and lame. Posted 06/30/2009 6:44 PMReply