- Discounted Calling Cards for Abroad Juniors -- Everyone uses Skype and Instant Messaging. Much cheaper than buying something that will most likely get the bookstore mark-up.
- Class of 2010 Apparel and Pennants -- Why would the school spend tons of money on clothing that'll only be relevant for four years? There's no resale value after 2010. Also, the juniors, like every other grade, got 2010 shirts at orientation (remember those?)
Blogs
+ Add Comment
Platform A Little Shaky

Junior Class Council Elections are apparently today, so in the interest of helping you choose (or convincing you to abstain) I submit for your consideration the above posters. Now, I'm not against people making promises for their elections -- it makes the senate seem like it isn't just a vestigial element -- but these promises are poorly conceived.













Comments
2) The school doesn't spend money on it. They wouldn't be free, it would be a service. It'd be cheaper then bookstore apparel and there would be a more personal connection to it. Posted 04/15/2008 10:23 AMReply
In a case where the TCU would give Class Council money to sell class gear, CC wouldn't attempt to make a profit because student organizations are financially dependent upon the TCU (and therefore have no incentive to do so.)
Since you're accusing me of selling things at bookstore prices, let's take for example an ulikely scenario in which a profit was earned. The profit would be reported, and the TCU would therefore adjust budgets to accommodate for the surplus and give CC less money. Either way TCU gives us the SAME AMOUNT. Our budget stays the same though because we earned the profit. In light of TCU rules about profits, making a profit (and not giving it back, which you insist happens) would be more work for us because instead of just saying we don't have money and we need it, we would have to EARN it.
Anyway, in a more relevant case that is at least remotely plausible, if we broke even, there is no reason for us to keep the money because we needed the money ONLY FOR production costs. Keeping the revenues would translate to a situation where the TCU would be giving us money not for a project but to invest and grow.
OR it would mean as I described above that since we're earning our own money, our profits could be subtracted from what they give us.
I hope you can understand that IN ALL of these situations, Senate is in NO WAY financially impacted (except by interest) by the idea of CC selling class apparel.
Oh and I don't know about you, but I don't buy Tufts apparel with any hopes of its value soaring some day. If you do, you may be right, class apparel is a little more personal. Better stick to the unspecified stuff to appeal to a broader base of buyers. Posted 04/15/2008 1:41 PMReply