- Serviced apartments london.
- Lunch Break Roundup: Homey D. Clown, Ben Stiller And Stephen Colbert
- Roselyn Sanchez Tops The Link Pile
- The Morning Mess With Katy Perry
- U2 Comes to Fordham
- Man fears sexual desires, has balls cut off
- Adriana Lima Tops The Link Pile
- Lucy Pinder Tops The Link Pile
- Profiles in Badass: Kid Gets a Luke Skywalker Bio-Arm
- Student Beats Would-Be Mugger Down Like He Owes Him Money
So apparently the guy who attacked a Scientology center with two samurai swords yesterday (who was subsequently blown away by a security guard with a 20th century weapon) was a crazed ex-church member named Mario Majewski on a mission to...well we still don't know.
But we do have this excerpt from an interview he did with UCLA's Daily Bruin. At the time he was suing the school for discriminating against Scientology. Boy have times changed.
"It is illegal and immoral for the University to provide tens of thousands of dollars of aid to West to try to destroy any religion. We intend to see that this is stopped."
Well, clearly it worked, as Scientology has blossomed into a full blown flower pirahanna plant snatching up depressed people and celebrities left and right. What changed Majewski's mind? I'm not sure, but I think we should all go here to samuraisagainstscientology.com to support his cause.
Yeah that's not a real website, but how awesome would it be it if it was?







Stumble It























http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/24/2008-11-24_fatally_shot_scientologist_was_mental_pa.html
And I disagree with people running around trying to kill people with swords. What's the difference whom they attack?!? This makes the act not less criminal. Imagine, if it would have been you! And imagine, you would not have had a gun to protect yourself! Posted 11/25/2008 11:13 AMReply
What this man did was horribly stupid and wrong, but the $cientology cult is not entirely without fault in this matter. Posted 11/25/2008 2:14 PMReply
And it's still true that the guy was mental ill like mad running around and trying to harm people with swords. Even if you think that it was okay because it was against Scientologist. It's still a criminal act, not matter what you say and how much you cry about it. Posted 11/26/2008 05:14 AMReply
The dead man's last --public-- documented purchase of Scientology's frauds was 4 years ago, and more documents that are not yet public are expected to be divulged by Anonymous via WikiLeaks due to the nature of the way the documentation was obtained.
Also the dead customer was not an "anti-Scientology" person, he was a customer, a Scientology customer classified by the Scientology crime syndicate as "in good standing" despite the bizarre threats and complaints he spewed over the past couple of years.
That behavior is --typicall-- of long-term Scientology customers who have had their brains turned in to pudding by the insane, highly debilitative "auditing" and "training routine" abuses that the drug-addled conman L. Ron Hubbard contrived while doped to the gills.
This latest dead Scientology customer at the hands of another violently insane Scientology criminal is also typical. As yet there has never been an act of violence against a Scientology ringleader, crime boss, or customer that was committed by someone who wasn't an active Scientology customer or a disguntled ex-customer. To date not a single non-Scientology person has assulted or harmed any Scientology idiot. It is --always-- Scientology vs. Scientology, and this latest dead customer is just more of the same.
Now the Scientology crime bosses and ringleaders are trying to paint the man as a member of Anonymous, an anti-Scientology consumer advocate, or some human rights or civil rights activist that went crazy. Bullshit! He was a Scientology customer the day Scientology killed him.
Just like Lisa McPherson was. Posted 11/26/2008 4:15 PMReply
This is called name calling and it is what immature individuals do to stick their fingers in their ears and drown out anything they are afraid of. Why are you afraid of considering that the 'tech' hindered this man's psychological growth?
I think there is evidence to support the claim, so use your mind and look at it too. Don't start calling everyone else criminals and perverts. Beleive it or not but there are rational individuals here on the outside who may not have an all-roses view of Scientology. Posted 11/30/2008 12:35 PMReply
"A transcript of a 1961 Hubbard lecture strongly suggests that Hubbard had personal views on the subject of the Germans. It boils down to (a) that Hubbard was a Roman fighting Germans in a past life and that (b) Germany has a national problem with "havingness" which makes the country perhaps uniquely prone to neurosis and psychosis. It is probably no accident that this lecture is being re-circulated in leaflet form at this present moment."
This is insane. Posted 12/01/2008 4:30 PMReply