UCLA Professor Can't Believe Many Black Students Deserve Admission and Quits

UCLA Professor Can't Believe Many Black Students Deserve Admission and Quits

Incapable of conceiving of any reason besides affirmative action for the recently increased body of admitted black students at UCLA, political science professor Tim Groseclose has resigned from the school’s admissions committee. This year the school admitted 230 black students, up from 103 in 2006, and Groseclose caught a whiff of some nefarious black people scheming. According to his 89-page masturbatory resignation, “A growing body of evidence strongly suggests that UCLA is cheating on admissions… It is obvious that the admissions staff was under intense pressure to admit more African Americans.”

 

The LA Times reports:

Political science professor Tim Groseclose resigned Thursday from the Committee on Undergraduate Admissions and Relations with Schools, saying high-ranking university administrators and fellow committee members are engaged in a "coverup" to block illegal activity from being discovered…


Proposition 209, a 1996 voter initiative, bars California's public universities from considering race and other factors such as religion in the admissions process. In ensuing years, the number of black students at UCLA and many other UC campuses dwindled. By 2006, only 103 entering freshmen and 108 transfer students at UCLA were black, the lowest level in more than three decades.

 

Prompted by campus and community concerns about the lack of student diversity, UCLA decided in 2006 to move to a "holistic" application process, in which applicants' grades, test scores, extracurricular activities and other factors were no longer reviewed separately. Rather, achievements could be considered in the context of their personal experiences, Lifka said.

 

UCLA officials have said the new process is fairer to all applicants, and they have emphasized that admissions officials continue to abide by the restrictions imposed by Proposition 209.

In a martyr-like maneuver, Groseclose announced his resignation by writing, "Because I cannot properly conduct the duties with which I am charged as a member of CUARS, I am therefore resigning, in protest, from the committee. To do otherwise would condone and make me complicit in what appears to be illegal activity." Instead, Groseclose can continue being complicit in what appears to be an ideology which correlates an increased black student body with a devious admissions process and remains skeptical of black achievement.
 

Advertisement

Comments

Anonymous
Candy,

This is an important issue. But you need to get your facts straight. I have read his report. It is clear that you have not.

Groseclose is not against black admissions. His argument is that UCLA's way of accomplishing the goal is likely illegal and inviting a massive lawsuit. He and others are asking UCLA for data that would allow them to conduct an analysis of applicants of *all* races. He is being stonewalled.

His report goes on to list several legal means by which the same goal can be achieved. You appear not to have gotten to reading this part of the report.

Part of being a responsible columnist or blogger is getting your facts straight. It would be helpful for you to start following such practices.
Posted 09/02/2008 11:17 AMReply
Anonymous
Candy, "Anonymous" above is right on target. Your entry makes it abundantly clear that you have not read Prof. Groseclose's document. It is carefully constructed to lay out the facts in his failed attempts, as an properly appointed university committee member, to get ANONYMOUS data on "holistic" admissions in order to assess whether UCLA is breaking the law. And you have the gall to incinuate that he is a racist and/or ideologue. You should be more than a little ashamed to take this important and potentially flammable issue and pour gasoline on it. Good bloggers always do two things before writing. (1) get the facts, (2) think. You evidently did neither. Posted 09/02/2008 2:46 PMReply
Anonymous
Amen to the above two comments. Candy Cook didn't even provide a link to Groseclose's report. (But here's one: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/groseclose/CUARS.Resignation.Report.pdf ). Posted 09/02/2008 3:59 PMReply
Anonymous
Way to defend yourself, Candy. Really tenacious. Posted 09/03/2008 1:29 PMReply
Anonymous
UCLA only admitted 208 black students in 2008 - that seems really low. Please don't mistake the following statement for racist generalizations - it really is just based on observation, but how many just regular, run-of-the-mill students does that equal after you take into account football, m/w track, and m/w basketball recruits. Doesn't seem like that many...as in, why is it so low to begin with? Posted 09/03/2008 5:22 PMReply
Anonymous
Quit apologizing. If a kid is admitted because hes black and not on their academic merits its illegal. It becomes even more problematic if one can prove a student with superior GPA was pushed aside to fill a quota. Affirmative action needs to be jerked out by the roots and ended. Posted 09/05/2008 11:20 AMReply
Anonymous
Talk about skewing Tim's report. Nowhere does he imply skepticism over black achievement.

Why don't you do us a favor and actually read the report.
Posted 09/15/2008 09:54 AMReply
Anonymous
Way to go Candy for failing to actually read his 89page report. I am baffled by your ignorant masturbatory ranting. Posted 09/15/2008 10:31 AMReply

Leave a comment


Please enter the text you see below or login to post with a username.