Marijuana Supporters: "Obama's Website Should Be Called Same.Gov"

Marijuana Supporters: "Obama's Website Should Be Called Same.Gov"

The fine hippies over at StopTheDrugWar.org are furious with President-elect Barack Obama.

 

Why? Because he doesn’t plan to legalize marijuana in the foreseeable future—if ever.

 

Their red-eyed outrage began with Obama’s homepage, Change.gov, which solicited questions from Obama supporters and determined the popularity of each one based on the total number of responses.

 

Unsurprisingly, marijuana’s legalization topped the list, but the Chronicle Blog took personal offense to Obama’s camp answering the question fourth.

 

Scott Morgan of the Chronicle Blog writes:

Not only did Obama’s team fail to explain the "no" answer, but they didn’t even honor the 1st place popularity rank the question earned when it drew the most votes from the public.


There’s nothing surprising about any of this, but it is indeed perfectly emblematic of the profound lack of seriousness with which this issue is treated in our political culture. The marijuana question was answered second to last and received the shortest response of all the questions.

OK, so Obama answered the question with a cold, unnerving, resounding “no.”

 

Would it have really made a difference if he had responded with a three-part dissertation that still concluded with a refusal to legalize marijuana?

 

The answer, yet again, is “no.”

 

You have to walk before you run, fellow hippies. Let’s get marijuana decriminalized first, and then shoot for the heavens.
 

+ 13 comments

Related Posts

Comments

Anonymous
Where are the dead?
A class I substance that is as lethal as this, surely they is atleast one dead body they can point to?

Maybe someone choked on a brownie at some point?

Hell GW almost choked to death on a pretzel, does that make pretzels more dangerous, hell that's one more that I have seen for this Class I substance.
Posted 12/17/2008 11:45 AMReply
Anonymous
âProhibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a manâs appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded.â
Abraham Lincoln December 18, 1840, to the Illinois House of Representatives.
These are the words of Barack's hero, let's hope he has the courage to do the right thing. I will not vote for him again if he does not honor a society that tolerates minority rights.
Posted 12/17/2008 12:11 PMReply
Anonymous
Barack Obama basically said he is for locking up another 800,000 Americans for simple marijuana possession charges. Well at least we now know to invest in the prison system because we know they are going to have lots of prisoners over the next 4 years! Posted 12/17/2008 12:39 PMReply
Anonymous
Decriminalization doesn't make economic sense. It fails to provide any sort of legal supply to meet the demand for marijuana and it persists the very conditions that entices dealers into our communities; unrelenting demand in combination with zero legal supply.

The ONLY logical policy for controlling marijuana is the same one we use today to control alcohol - legal production and sale by licensed, reputable businesses.
Posted 12/17/2008 5:07 PMReply
Anonymous
Yes it woukd have mattered. Maybe he has good reason and maybe he doesn't. Thats important on any question. Posted 12/18/2008 3:36 PMReply
Anonymous
Should have voted for Nader. He supports decriminalization and medical use. Posted 12/18/2008 6:52 PMReply
Anonymous
One need only look at the legal quagmire already created in MA to realize nationwide decriminalization = more confusion.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/18/us/18marijuana.html?_r=1&ref=us

The "P" in L.E.A.P. isn't there just to make a word.
Posted 12/19/2008 08:28 AMReply
Anonymous
i think Barak is smarter than that. He will wait until the issue gains more popularity in terms of decriminalization on state level and pull the trigger before he's out of the office Posted 12/19/2008 10:41 AMReply
Anonymous
Gee,I'm confused...I support marijuana legalization and I'm far from being a hippy.As a matter of fact I'm a veteran of US Army Special Forces and my job was to defend the constitution.The people at DCRNet are also trying to defend the constitution,maybe if you got a real education you'd be able to figure that out. Posted 12/19/2008 11:43 AMReply
Anonymous
I think it makes a difference whether an explanation is given. You can ahead and eat up whatever bullsh*t politicions feed you, but I want an explanation at least, does that make me a hippy??? Posted 12/20/2008 3:04 PMReply
Anonymous
obama's site should be renamed "sameoldshit.gov" we the potheads are being sold out once again

aron pieman kay aka yippie pie thrower
http://www.pieman.org
pieman420@gmail.com
Posted 12/20/2008 7:17 PMReply
Anonymous
why do we have to decriminalize. Legalization has more benefits than decriminalization. Its been long enough. And us Cannabis smokers are tired of it. It's complete bs. If it's what we want we WILL get it. I am against decriminalization, I am 100% for legalization of it ASAP.
It's time for a change. And not a slow and gradual change. An immediate change is necessary. Don't support decriminalization, Support 100% legalization
Posted 12/22/2008 10:03 AMReply
Anonymous
Change will come only when everyone in drug policy reform finally understands we're getting the same verbal blowjob from Democrats that the religious right has been receiving all these years from Republicans.

When good people obey bad law, bad law never changes. The question is this: Should our civil disobedience continue to be peaceful?
Posted 12/26/2008 3:24 PMReply

Add a comment

Anonymous comment

Please enter the code or log in.

Facebook Comment