Survey Shows Harry Potter Rules, Holden Caulfield Has Staying Power

Survey Shows Harry Potter Rules, Holden Caulfield Has Staying Power
Surveys of UC Berkeley freshmen conducted in 1987, 1997, and 2007 regarding books students read for pleasure have been released and--surprise!--we have enduringly terrible taste.

Just kidding!

Tastes in literature ranged from high-brow (1997's The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoevsky) to low-brow (1997's How Stella Got Her Groove Back, Terry McMillan; 2007's numerous Harry Potter titles and The Da Vinci Code, Dan Brown); pretentious (1987 and 1997's The Fountainhead, Ayn Rand) to classic (1997 and 2007's 1984, George Orwell); romantic (Jane Austen and Amy Tan totally own) to the old stand-by Tortured Teenage Soul novel, J.D. Salinger's Catcher in the Rye.

What's clear is that Cal students, supposedly the cream of the crop intellect-wise, scarcely look past their high school reading lists for inspiration. Is it a bad sign our list of favorite books shares several titles with that of my ten-year-old brother? J.K. Rowling is pretty amazing, but we should probably be reading books not related to 17-year-olds learning magic, if only because Harry's jailbait for most of us.

Related Posts