- Watch Unnatural History: Season 1 Episode 12 :Speetlemania
- Where to Buy Vimax Pills in UNITED KINGDOM UK :: ONLINE
- Vimax Pills - Vimax Penis Pills - Buy Vimax Expert
- Steve Carell Vs. Stephen Colbert In "Even Ste(v)phen"
- Here's Yet Another 130 Great Arnold Schwarzenegger Quotes To Brighten Up Your Day
- Reuters: "Tired Gay Succumbs To Dix In 200 Meters"
- Double Rainbow Causes Man to Spastically Laugh And Cry For Our Amusement
- The Internet Personified: A Robotic Nightmare With Man-Boobs
- Hate Justin Bieber? Great! Help Us Send Him To North Korea
- Ladies, Don't Try This At Home, a Party or Anywhere Else
Surveys of UC Berkeley freshmen conducted in 1987, 1997, and 2007 regarding books students read for pleasure have been released and--surprise!--we have enduringly terrible taste.
Just kidding!
Tastes in literature ranged from high-brow (1997's The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoevsky) to low-brow (1997's How Stella Got Her Groove Back, Terry McMillan; 2007's numerous Harry Potter titles and The Da Vinci Code, Dan Brown); pretentious (1987 and 1997's The Fountainhead, Ayn Rand) to classic (1997 and 2007's 1984, George Orwell); romantic (Jane Austen and Amy Tan totally own) to the old stand-by Tortured Teenage Soul novel, J.D. Salinger's Catcher in the Rye.
What's clear is that Cal students, supposedly the cream of the crop intellect-wise, scarcely look past their high school reading lists for inspiration. Is it a bad sign our list of favorite books shares several titles with that of my ten-year-old brother? J.K. Rowling is pretty amazing, but we should probably be reading books not related to 17-year-olds learning magic, if only because Harry's jailbait for most of us.







Stumble It












