College Girl Trades Sex for Money, Calls Self Classy

College Girl Trades Sex for Money, Calls Self Classy

Sugar daddies have belonged to our social lexicon for years, but in an article written for the Daily Beast, college student Melissa Beech manages to make the women they screw seem even more superficial, spoiled, greedy, and deluded than harsh paradigms might predict.


First, Beech identifies herself as a Pennsylvanian Irish Catholic republican “blessed to have been raised with class, sent to the best schools, and taught to be well read, well spoken, and well traveled.” Evidently there’s nothing classier than spreading your legs for an older man who gives you money. Beech did not enter her relationship out of necessity. As she describes it, the relationship was begotten out of a consumerist addiction and an inability to muster the energy to wait tables:

When I got to college, I spent the first two years straining for financial independence. I tried working, but in retail, surrounded by temptation all day, I spent more than I made. Waiting tables was exhausting. I went on several job interviews, but all of the internships were unpaid… During my job hunt, I met a potential employer. He was in his early thirties, single and successful. He didn’t hire me, but he did suggest a position that seemed perfectly suited to my attributes and skills: he proposed that he become my benefactor. From the outside, a mutually beneficial, or sugar daddy, relationship seems immoral. Maybe even the distant cousin of—dare I say it?—prostitution. But truth be told, women have used their wiles and charms to get ahead for years.

So what exactly are these “attributes and skills?” Swimming in convenient sophistry to justify exchanging sex for a monthly allowance, gifts, and vacations such as their trip to Atlantic City when they stayed in “the poshest hotel in town?” And what is this position? Bending over? Beech goes on to glorify the relationship in terms of opportunity and professional advancement; essentially though her sugar daddy didn’t think she was competent enough to be his own intern, he hooked her up with some of his less picky contacts and bought her expensive stuff:

He didn’t hire me for the internship position, but because of him I have had several internships at well-known PR companies…He’s given me a chance to live the type of life that I never would have experienced on my own. We went to London and Paris last spring, where we saw the sights and shopped at stores like Chanel and Dior. How many other college students are wearing Christian Louboutins to class? Probably very few…and when our time together is through, I will part with a lifelong friend, a great career and a killer wardrobe.

While very few college students may wear Christian Louboutin shoes to class, very few get down on their knees to get them either. Then again, if Beech wants to blow for Berkin bags, that’s her hoo-ha to do with as she will.
 

+ 26 comments

Related Posts

Comments

Anonymous
"Distant cousin" of prostitution? It's prostitution on a subscription plan. Posted 12/02/2008 12:25 PMReply
Anonymous
smart girl. The girls have a window of opportunity from 18-30 to write their own checks and become independent The girls who get committed early and become baby ovens only to get dumped by their husbands when their beauty wears off are the looses. Posted 12/02/2008 12:58 PMReply
Anonymous
This sounds like a normal relationship, except the girl is explicitly into the guy for the money.

Oh wait, this sounds like a normal relationship.
Posted 12/02/2008 1:18 PMReply
Anonymous
Sounds like every PR major I've ever run into: RETARDED. Posted 12/02/2008 1:43 PMReply
Anonymous
sounds like a slut to me Posted 12/02/2008 1:54 PMReply
Anonymous
hmm: As a Pennsylvanian Irish Catholic DEMOCRAT, I do not engage in any kind of sex-for-money.

So am I allowed to draw the logical conclusion there?
Posted 12/02/2008 2:00 PMReply
Anonymous
I don't know how anyone feels that they can actually make judgements on this woman. It is her option and her body. Posted 12/02/2008 2:13 PMReply
Anonymous
what's her phone number Posted 12/02/2008 2:40 PMReply
Anonymous
I have no problems with prostitution, but if the drive to legalize it could be called a movement this shallow sot would set that movement back ten years. Posted 12/02/2008 2:41 PMReply
Anonymous
I couldn't care less. There are all kinds of relationships out there. Posted 12/02/2008 4:35 PMReply
Anonymous
this is why dating and relationships are so hard today. Females are no longer satisfied with being human, they have the "princess" syndrome which hugh hephners alike feed off of. Party party do what you want with your body. but then why all the medicine and herpe cream in your cabinet. you see, every sinful indulgent has its price. If you can live with STD's and knowing you have been used for paper money that is backed by debt and no longer worth anything (still accepted as money at the moment) then thats up to the female.

People ask me, an attractive 39 male, why Im so picky but if "Hugh pick me, pick me" is really going on then Im not
going for a instant daddy role or the rossane barr who emailed me that when i finally see her pic that i would be tempted. it has to be worth my while and females are more crazy then ever. i have been single in the 80's dated and single now. females have changed for the worse, but so have the males
Posted 12/02/2008 5:19 PMReply
Anonymous
What she's doing is prostitution, no bones about it. If she's happy hoeing herself out to the highest bidder, good for her, but stop trying to make this about everyone else being close minded. Posted 12/02/2008 8:01 PMReply
Anonymous
All men pay for sex, one way or another. All women take goods and services for sex, one way or another. Posted 12/02/2008 8:38 PMReply
Anonymous
@ Anonymous: You may be good looking but not being able to write a clear cogent sentence makes you look dumb! Posted 12/03/2008 5:06 PMReply
Anonymous
Birkin. It's spelt Birkin. Beyond that, her body, her choice. Posted 12/08/2008 2:42 PMReply
Anonymous
give me change u happy after sex do sex with me i promisse to u becose i know Posted 12/15/2008 06:02 AMReply
Anonymous
Honestly, does anyone else actually believe this horseshit? In the follow-up "The Sugar Daddy Replies" piece, they include a photograph of the couple. Oh, my. Trust me, any man who spends that much time on their body isn't also simultaneously successful in business.

And who on earth snapped that photo of the happy couple? It looks positively paparazzi, yet "somehow" the author got her hands on the pic to publish. Uhhhhh-huh.

This entire story is cut from whole cloth. Sugar Daddies are simply not that perfect-attractive, they're not single, and they're not interested in monogamous relationships and meeting the family. The bullshit photo is a silly attempt to romanticize a fraud.
Posted 12/15/2008 5:10 PMReply
Anonymous
Im a Prostitute and she makes my people look bad!!! Posted 12/16/2008 12:11 AMReply
Anonymous
well i can tell you as a sugar daddy myself that having a young college girl is no different than being with an older woman that you have to support and split have your wealth with when you get tired of each other after eighteen years.
the young college girl i am with is so beautiful that i don't even need Viagra. she makes it worth it and as far as i know i am her only man so it seems like a normal 2008 relationship.
Posted 12/16/2008 2:31 PMReply
Anonymous
Yeah, it's very important to me.

email me at: carpenterz@tamu.edu
Posted 12/20/2008 01:47 AMReply
Anonymous
Not every girl goes into this form of arrangement because of the Chanel, Dior or Louboutin. For some, it's truly because they need help in paying for college, and given the rates for proper education nowadays, not everyone can afford it.

If given the chance but without the resources, what is one going to do about it? And if someone is willing to be a benefactor, what is wrong with that? From the economical view point, it's supply and demand.

Granted, probably most girls are into this arrangement for the fast and easy lane rather than waiting tables, but it just doesn’t cut it to think that everyone goes into it for the exact same reasons.

There are always two sides to a story, and two faces on a coin.
Posted 12/23/2008 02:53 AMReply
Anonymous
Good looking women know they are good looking, and they are looking for one of two things. A person that physically attracts them or a person that can help them get ahead. If you are both attractive and wealthy/powerful then you can get any woman you want. This girl is just being honest about it, just replace Dior/Chanel with home, security, car, kids. Take away the job, car, security lets see how many attractive women stay with their boyfriends/husbands/mates. So you want to be average in your life you don't have a chance, beautiful women know they have a commodity and you have to be worthy to get it. Just like wealthy men know they have something most people don't have, how is that not prostitution. How is a woman who leaves her husband when he gets down and out after losing his career or job not a prostitute. She was there for a reason, that reason is gone, so they get a divorce. If you think that is rare, then you are the biggest moron in this country. Over 50% (that is more than half) get divorced, of which over 75% is due to stress brought upon their marriage due to financial problems. With the economy the way it is, all that will happen is more of that, and more of what this woman is talking about. Hell if I was an attractive woman, I have something that never goes through a recession or goes out of style, beauty, and I would trade it for a well to do husband. Yes a husband, that is my trade off, he gets a trophy wife and I get security that nobody else could offer, if he loses his money he will lose me as well. How does that not make me a prostitute, better a prostitute with society looking down on me (who gives two craps about society), then homeless or working at walmart. You keep your self respect bs, Ill keep a roof over my head and food in my stomach. Posted 02/16/2009 4:49 PMReply
Anonymous
I have always known that women **** for money, but maintain a sense of being high class.

I know women who live above their means but always have very expensive things.

these kind of women men are stupid. they take the "gifts" for sex but will become outraged if you say their prostitutes.

women wonder why then men treat them like sex objects.
Posted 07/01/2009 11:14 AMReply
Anonymous
Whenever the man in the relationship is the financial provider, the relationship is fairly characterized as "prostitution." That has been the order of things since the beginning of time.

Are there any beautiful college women reading this who are interested in establishing a similar relationship . . . in Pennsylvania? I am a dashing, potential benefactor. Seriously!
Posted 07/01/2009 1:22 PMReply
Anonymous
sex 4 money yeah babyIt;s too good to be true e-mail me!!! then we'll talk. serious only. no losers. cindyw34487@yahoo. Posted 09/10/2009 12:22 AMReply
Anonymous
I live in thorsby al where are you so we can meet each other.@ Anonymous: Posted 11/02/2009 10:48 PMReply

Add a comment

Anonymous comment

Please enter the code or log in.

Facebook Comment