According to Rutgers, Moisturizing Could Lead to Skin Cancer

According to Rutgers, Moisturizing Could Lead to Skin Cancer

Coming straight from the research labs of Rutgers, a study was published in Journal of Investigative Dermatology stating that some skin moisturizers may increase the chances of getting a type of skin cancer called squamous cell carcinoma.

 

The mechanism behind the cancer inducing effects of moisturizers are unknown, and the carcinogenic ingredient(s) are also undiscovered. But scientists suspect mineral oil and sodium laurel sulphate, two common additives in moisturizers.

 

Interestingly, Rutgers and Johnson & Johnson have already come up with a patented kind of moisturizer that contain no mineral oil or sodium laurel sulphate.

 

As reported in Rutger's local newspaper, the Hackensack, NJ-based Record (and for some reason available online via the Tulsa World):

    Moisturizers may speed skin cancer in reformed sunbathers, even years after giving up on tanning, according to a Rutgers University study of mice.

    Four different brands of moisturizing creams caused tumors to form faster and larger in hairless mice that had been pretreated with ultraviolet radiation, the Rutgers researchers reported Thursday in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

    "We don't know what happens in humans," said Alan Conney, who led the study. "But this is a red light saying there should be some epidemiological study in human populations."

    Manufacturers of the products — Eucerin Original Moisturizing Creme, Vanicream, Dermabase and Dermovan, all chosen randomly for the study — refuted the findings.

    "Eucerin Original Creme has been on the market for more than 100 years and is a highly respected, dermatologist-recommended brand," a statement by Beiersdorf Inc. said.

    "It has been widely used by both individuals with normal skin and those with diseased skin under the care of physicians without any incidents of this nature ever reported."

    PSI Pharmaceutical Specialties, makers of Vanicream, said the results had "doubtful significance," given the methods that were used.

So maybe we're all better off with dry-skin.  Full story here.

+ 34 comments

Related Posts

Comments

Anonymous
sodium laurel sulphate is just about the first ingredient in most toothpastes! Posted 08/16/2008 9:34 PMReply
Anonymous
Well, this is certainly an incredibly vague article. Why are there no numbers? What percent increase is there in the chance of getting cancer? Sometimes they have studies where they pump animals' stomachs full of chemicals 40 times the recommend amount, and a very small percent develop cancer, and then they claim they "may be carinogenic" and people stop using these products topically not knowing under what extreme condtions disease MAY develop. Posted 08/16/2008 9:50 PMReply
Anonymous
This article is worthless! Posted 08/16/2008 9:55 PMReply
Anonymous
This is the second time unrelated investigative orgs have isolated mineral oil and sodium laurel sulphate as cancerous. Nothing vague about it lobbyist whoever you are. This world needs to take notice. Remember the cigerette people still say cigs are safe. Mineral oil robs the body of it's defense mechanisms such as certain vitamins and some of us have known this for years. Take the pink themed products - full of mineral oil and how those so called christians can still be pushing the products is evil not to mention the pink cars they when by introducing more people to the possibility of cancer in the name of Jesus. Well, praise the Lord anyway, right. Check the active ingredient in Colgate toothpaste "tri___leon" when mixed with floride water become famaldihyde(sp?). The tube tells you not to swallow it - wonder why? - and yet our children are coming down with all kindsof cancer. What industry will do for the almight dollar God will not honor much longer. Abortions counts are nothing compared to the cancer rates amongst children. Wake up mothers and fathers and stop giving in period. Posted 08/16/2008 10:05 PMReply
Anonymous
Both of these chemicals are in our shampoos and creme rinses/conditioners. And the person that mentioned the treseleone in a certain toothpaste is absolutely correct. Whoever the invalidators are that first made comments must have a vested interested in invalidating the truth. Welcome to America. Posted 08/16/2008 10:09 PMReply
Anonymous
Can a nigga get a table dance? Posted 08/16/2008 10:12 PMReply
Anonymous
Oh, speaking of triscelon = you can find it in Dial handsoaps. Hot water opens pores and tricseleone goes in the open pores and collects in the body. The biggest organ on our body are the pores and what do we do we cover it, suffocate it and choke our pores to death and we go with it to the grave. I agree with the person who said the lobbyists are trying to quelch this information that's so vital to we as mothers and fathers. I told my friends about it and they are too lazy to care. So dear lobbyists don't worry American can be bothered with the truth anyway. Posted 08/16/2008 10:14 PMReply
Anonymous
Can uh nigga git uh table get jiggy wit it? Ifn hesa got cash money! what the **** sup now? Posted 08/16/2008 10:25 PMReply
Anonymous
Can a nigga shut the hell up? Posted 08/16/2008 10:34 PMReply
Anonymous
Rutgers did this study and Rutgers came out with a new cream. This is a disgusting and shameful way of hawking their product while putting the fear of God in us mice. Posted 08/16/2008 10:36 PMReply
Anonymous
Sodium laurel sulphate is called SDS in Europe and has been banned for years. In the US it is in virtually every shampoo, etc. Posted 08/16/2008 10:42 PMReply
Anonymous
whats the new cream? Posted 08/16/2008 10:46 PMReply
Anonymous
@ Anonymous: Ok, so don't use toothpaste as a moisturizer. Boy, you guys are dumb. ;-) Posted 08/16/2008 10:46 PMReply
Anonymous
Hey moron. Ever consider it is as bad or even worse to put a cancer causing ingredient in your mouth? Companies get away with selling us carcinogens such as "Natural Flavors" or by not even listing the ingredients at all such as in the case of fabric detergent. Your skin is an organ and we should be told what is in these products just like food. Posted 08/16/2008 10:52 PMReply
Anonymous
Moisterize naturally with sweat. Posted 08/16/2008 10:53 PMReply
Anonymous
OMG, I didn't know any of this. I've been using a lot of Tom's of Maine products because I thought they were healthier and it turns out they are not! I just looked on the label and they also use sodium laurel sulphate! The label reads that the SLS is from Coconut oil and Palm oil. No one is safe. Posted 08/16/2008 10:54 PMReply
Anonymous
so basically, don't breathe or you will get cancer? Posted 08/16/2008 11:27 PMReply
Anonymous
SLS or sodium lauryl sulfate is in most face soaps, shampoos and tooth paste! Some people are really sensitive to it and it can cause severe mouth burning and sores. There are a couple of toothpastes that do not contain sodium lauryl sulfate. I had a sore mouth for several years---hot hurt, cold hurt, sweets hurt, spices killed! Then I read about "sls" and I quit using toothpastes with it and within a week, my mouth was better. When I try it again, within a couple days, my mouth gets sore. Posted 08/16/2008 11:29 PMReply
Anonymous
Isn't it funny how only Americans get Cancer? Posted 08/16/2008 11:31 PMReply
Anonymous
wtf.. every damn things we eat or use are in some way contaminated or using supposedly toxic chemical (if consumed or used in large qty, that is). I guess that's why there are things like advertising, PR and all that crap. Strange to use soap without bubbles though. maybe we do have choices - use less or none. Posted 08/16/2008 11:35 PMReply
Anonymous
Can I still use the mineral oils to laksative my baby ]:-l ?? hes 2 Posted 08/16/2008 11:41 PMReply
Anonymous
*laxative???

i'm not only shocked by the shadiness of the rutgers' scientists but the stupidity in some of these people's comments.

for shame.
Posted 08/17/2008 12:00 AMReply
Anonymous
here is a list of all products containing SLS.
http://householdproducts.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/household/brands?tbl=chem&id=98
Posted 08/17/2008 12:21 AMReply
Anonymous
and from the Hazardous Substance Database site:
http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/r?dbs+hsdb:@term+@rn+151-21-3
Posted 08/17/2008 12:28 AMReply
Valencia Chang
@Anonymous#2: You can find the numbers if you look up this study

@everyone else: I basically try not to rely on any product all the time, so that I only take in the unavoidable toxins in moderation, sadly there's no way around coming in contact with these things :( Although, it's ALWAYS a good idea to take statistics and studies with a grain of salt, particularly in the case when a popular ingredient is being discredited at the same time an alternative is being introduced by the person who conducted the study
Posted 08/17/2008 05:57 AMReply
Anonymous
Wear a cap or hat with a brim in sunshine. Stay away from any food or cream ingredients you can;t spell. Enjoy life, quit heavy smoking, and drinking til you drop- too much of anything will eventually cause problems. Posted 08/17/2008 08:47 AMReply
Anonymous
New Zealanders have high cancer rates-- even on their little paradise island. Posted 08/17/2008 08:50 AMReply
Anonymous
Moisturizers are classified as cosmetics by the FDA, which does not require that they undergo the same safety and efficacy tests required for drugs. This study seems to be the first to test them, and its worth noting that the researchers were trying to find out if caffeine would help heal skin cancers. Their results were unexpected.

Also, mineral oil was the other suspected ingredient in the moisturizers. It is a component of petroleum, which is one of the most carcinogic substances on the planet. Don't use vaseline, baby oil, or creams with these things in it if you care about your health. Your skin does absorb the things you put on it - and why put something know to cause cancer on it?

I am so glad to read about this study!
Posted 08/17/2008 09:11 AMReply
Anonymous
What about the bad stuff in my sunscreen? Do I put the sunscreen on and get cancer from the ingredients, or skip the sunscreen and get cancer from the sun? Posted 08/17/2008 11:04 AMReply
Anonymous
Skin cancer is a killer! Somebody should grab www.moisturizercancer.com and turn it into a one-stop consumer assistance site. It should provide answers to all these questions: What products are safe and which should be avoided? Which ingredients are dangerous? In what concentrations? What alternative products are there (that are safe but accomplish the same thing)? Who can I complain to? How can I get a refund for a moisturizer I've bought? What should I tell or ask my doctor? What signs of problems should I be on the alert for? There's a crying need for quality consumer education on this! Posted 08/17/2008 4:36 PMReply
Anonymous
its too awkward to say that this article is factual.... Posted 08/18/2008 04:21 AMReply
Anonymous
reading the replies was more entertaining than the "study" article Posted 08/18/2008 1:12 PMReply
Anonymous
i used toothpaste as lube a few times, think my boyfriend is at risk for colon cancer? http://tinyurl.com/6xr3b7 Posted 08/18/2008 3:57 PMReply
LoLobster
everything causes cancer huh... Posted 08/19/2008 6:31 PMReply

Add a comment

Anonymous comment

Please enter the code or log in.

Facebook Comment