Some Eyewitness Accounts Support Mallo's Police Report

Some Eyewitness Accounts Support Mallo's Police Report
OTR readers: Thank you for the new information! One of the unique advantages of internet journalism is that it’s interactive and can be easily revised when new information surfaces.

Of course, this interactive quality also permits readers to tell me exactly how worthless they think bloggers are, by saying, for example: “internet journalists aren’t worth a damn.” Tear, tear.

In any case, new information has come to OTR's attention via comment on a previous post--a number of eyewitness accounts substantiate Officer Mallo’s police report. So in the name of journalism, OTR must ammend its previous statement: Officer Mallo might not be a liar, and her pants are not necessarily on fire.

I would like to make it clear, however, that I discredited Mallo's report in the first place because the available evidence indicated that it was fabricated. And because of the plasticity of human memory, it’s often appropriate to rely on video footage (or DNA evidence) over eyewitness testimony--this is currently a big issue in criminal law.

Free speech and argumentative discourse are fundamental to universities--and college blogs.

People aren't always polite when they express their opinions freely (*ahem*, Anonymous Commenters 1 - 17), but there are ways to deal with disruption that don't involve tasers.
Advertisement

Comments

Anonymous
The guy didn't get tasered for causing a disruption, he got tasered because he started pushing and shoving the cops and that's never a good idea.

The cops got in his face because he caused a disruption, but all he had to do was calm down and sit down and there would have been no tasering.
Posted 09/20/2007 7:47 PMReply
Anonymous
^^you are a ****ing idiot... Posted 09/22/2007 07:04 AMReply
Anonymous
He caused a disturbance and was asked to leave. When the officers attempted to escort him out of the room he became disruptive and attempted to evade the officers. When finally grabbed he was given several chances to comply with the officers before he was told he would be tasered if he did not comply. Even after the warning he continued to fight the officers.

It was not the officers who cut his microphone.
It was not the officers who caused a scene.
It was not the officers who ran around yelling.

The "video evidence" of this event was filmed and posted not by normal campus media. It was filmed, edited, and posted by friends of his. Friends who have taped other previous practical jokes and pranks performed by the same individual.

When deciding on the validity of your evidence to discredit a police report you may want to consider it's source.
Posted 09/24/2007 6:54 PMReply
Anonymous
This young man is going to own the UoF and the future earnings of all of the officers involved. This is what happens when citizens allow their local elected officials or public agencies to hire police officers who come primarily from the bottom 10% of high school graduates. I respect the job that police officers perform. However, I believe we as citizens and tax payers should require that the people that fill those jobs come from the top 20% of educated professionals. Posted 09/28/2007 7:17 PMReply
Anonymous
I AM A POLICE OFFICER. AN OFFICER LAID ON HANDS WAY TO QUICK. THE SPEAKER TOLD THE OFFICERS THAT HE WOULD ANSWER THE QUESTION SAYING NO NO . THE VICTIM DID HOWEVER TAKE ADVANTAGE TO MAKE A SCENE AND A POINT. BOTH OF WHICH WERE MADE. THE OFFICERS DID HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO TAZE ONCE THE CONFRONTATION BECAME OF A THREATENING NATURE. AS A FORMER WASHINGTON D.C. MARINE I CAN TELL YOU THAT THIS LOOKED ALOT LIKE A DEVERSION AND I WOULD HAVE BEEN CONCERNED.
THE KID WAS IN THE PROCESS OF MAKING A SCENE BUT HAD NOT YET DONE SO. AS AN OFFICER I WOULD HAVE LET HIM TALK UNTIL IT APPEARED TO OFFEND THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE. THE SPEAKER WAS THERE TO FIELD QUESTIONS AND THE KID WAS ASKING A GOOD ONE.
Posted 09/29/2007 11:58 PMReply
Anonymous
THIS IS THE SAME OFFICER AS BEFORE. I JUST WANTED TO AD. THE VIDEO CLEARLY SETS UP A TIME LINE AND SEQUENCE OF EVENTS AND INTENTIONS. FROM WHAT I HAVE READ OF THE INCIDENT REPORT. I WOULD RECOMEND A HEARING WITH THE POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION ON THE GROUNDS OF FALSIFYING A POLICE REPORT, OFFICIAL MISSCONDUCT, AND IF SHE SIGNED THE COMPLAINT BASED ON FALSIFIED GROUNDS, POSSIBLE WRONGFUL ARREST AND PROSECUTION. ALSO IF HE WAS HELD FOR ANY AMOUNT OF TIME , WRONGFUL IMPRSONMENT. Posted 09/30/2007 12:10 AMReply

Leave a comment


Please enter the text you see below or login to post with a username.